Submission date
28/08/2009
Registration date
11/09/2009
Last edited
11/09/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Retrospectively registered
? Protocol not yet added
? SAP not yet added
? Results not yet added and study completed for more than 2 years
? Raw data not yet added
Study completed

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Contact name

Prof Nobuari Takakura

ORCID ID

Contact details

2-9-1 Ariake Koto-ku
Tokyo
135-0063
Japan
+81 3 6703 7016
takakura@t-ariake.ac.jp

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

N/A

Study information

Scientific title

Acronym

Study hypothesis

The double-blind placebo needle could be effective in a randomised clinical acupuncture trial in which multiple placebo needles are administered as treatment.

Ethics approval(s)

Ethics approval received from the Ethics Committee of Showa University, School of Medicine on the 24th December 1999 (ref: 65).

Study design

Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled single-centre study

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Study setting(s)

Other

Study type

Treatment

Patient information sheet

Condition

Healthy subjects with stiff neck

Intervention

Mean age: 32.1 ± 9.9 years, 31 males, 25 females
Aim: To assess whether the double-blind placebo needle is effective in a randomised clinical acupuncture trial in which multiple placebo needles are administered as treatment.
Interventions: Non-penetrating control needles which the needle tip did not reach the skin (control), non-penetrating placebo needles which the needle tip pressed against the skin (placebo) and the penetrating (verum) needles.

In this trial, each of 6 acupuncturists (mean +/- SD year: 12.5 ± 11.8 years) applied acupuncture treatment to 20 patients. For each treatment, the acupuncturist applied 4 needles to the subject's shoulder. After completion of treatment with 4 needles, the practitioner and subject were asked to record whether the treatment was "non-penetrating control," "non-penetrating placebo", "penetrating", or "unidentifiable." After the treatment, the subjects were asked on their improvement in intensity of stiff neck on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from -100 (the most intense stiff neck in the past) to 0 (no improvement) to 100 (no stiff neck). One treatment and no follow-up.

Intervention type

Other

Primary outcome measure

Numbers of correctly, incorrectly and unidentified treatments by practitioners and subjects.

Secondary outcome measures

Improvement of stiff neck on a VAS (0-100) immediately after treatment.

Overall study start date

26/01/2009

Overall study end date

24/02/2009

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

1. Both males and females
2. Healthy volunteers
3. Age range: 18-70 years

Participant type(s)

Healthy volunteer

Age group

Adult

Lower age limit

18 Years

Upper age limit

70 Years

Sex

Both

Target number of participants

120

Participant exclusion criteria

Unhealthy volunteers

Recruitment start date

26/01/2009

Recruitment end date

24/02/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

Japan

Study participating centre

2-9-1 Ariake Koto-ku
Tokyo
135-0063
Japan

Sponsor information

Organisation

Hanada College (Japan)

Sponsor details

20-1 Sakuragaoka-machi Shibuya-ku
Tokyo
150-0031
Japan
+81 3 3461 4787
m-hanada@hanada.ac.jp

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

http://www.hanada.ac.jp/

ROR

https://ror.org/0373a6k33

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Funder name

Hanada College (Japan)

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype

Location

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan

IPD sharing plan summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?

Additional files

Editorial Notes