Welcome
Support Centre
06 September 2008 
Current Controlled Trials - Clinical Trials
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   UKCTG  |   links  |   information  |   news
Introduction
English introduction Introduction en français Deutsche einleitung
Introducción española Introduzione in italiano
 
Find trials
active registers
UKCTG
mental health register
archived registers
all registers
tips on searching
 
Registration
submit trials
 
Information
about mRCT
mRCT FAQs
data items
memorandum
contributors

DISCLAIMER
The site should not be used to diagnose or treat a health problem. Please consult your doctor.
Terms & conditions

DUPLICATION
Your search result may contain a number of different records for the same trial. This occurs when the same trial is listed in more than one register.

[ ...Back to search results ] [ Print-friendly version ]
An evaluation of the Cares of Life Project (CoLP): Fundamentally improving mental health services for Black people in Southwark
Source of recordUK Clinical Trials Gateway
ISRCTNISRCTN06101946
Date ISRCTN assigned14/09/2007
Local reference number(s)N0042132131
Public titleAn evaluation of the Cares of Life Project (CoLP): Fundamentally improving mental health services for Black people in Southwark
Scientific title
AcronymCoLP (Cares of Life Project)
Disease/condition/study domainAnxiety and /or depression
Study hypothesisThe primary hypothesis for the study was that compared to individuals who were randomised to the 'standard access' control group, individuals randomised to the 'rapid access' intervention group would after a 3-month follow-up period:
1. Show significantly improved levels of psychological well-being

Secondary hypotheses were that individuals in the intervention group would:
1. Rate mental health services as being more culturally sensitive
2. Have greater trust in mental health services
3. Be more satisfied with mental health services
4. Have reduced negative beliefs about mental health services
Design/methodologyA randomised controlled trial.
Research ethics reviewSouth London and Maudsley Research Ethics Commitee, approved on 15 November 2002 (ref: 176/02)
Countries of trialUnited Kingdom
Participants - inclusion criteriaIndividuals who were referred to the service were included in the study if they met all of the following criteria:
1. Resident of the London Borough of Southwark
2. Of Black African origin (Black African individuals born in sub-Saharan Africa or born in the UK with at least one parent of sub-Saharan decent) or Black Caribbean origin (Black patients born in the Caribbean or born in the UK with at least one parent of Caribbean decent).
3. Scored positive for symptoms on the World Health Organisation Mental Health Checklist for Anxiety and Depression indicating a diagnosis of clinical depression (ICD-10 codes F32, F33.0 - F33.2) and/or anxiety (F40, F41.1, F41.2)
4. Consented to being randomised
Participants - exclusion criteria1. Non-English speaking
2. Resident of another borough
3. Did not score positive for symptoms on the WHO checklist for anxiety and depression
Patient information material
Anticipated start date01/06/2002
Anticipated end date31/05/2006
Status of trialCompleted
Target number of participants80
InterventionsThe experimental group had rapid access to Community Health Workers who delivered a needs-led package of care comprising psychological therapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, Brief Solution Focused Therapy), health education, advocacy, mentoring and some physical health investigations (blood pressure and blood sugar testing). The control group had 'standard access.' Individuals were followed up after 3 months of receiving the intervention.
Primary outcome measure(s)Psychological well-being and general functioning were rated using the following at baseline and 3-month follow-up:
1. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28)
2. Short Form 36 (SF-36)
3. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)
Secondary outcome measure(s)1. Perceived access to and cultural sensitivity of mental health services, rated using the Accessibility and Cultural Sensitivity Schedule (ACCeSS), assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up
2. Satisfaction with mental health services rated using the Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (TPQ) at 3-month follow-up
3. Trust in mental health services examined using the TRUST semi-structured interview schedule at 3-month follow-up
4. Cost of service use (CSRI) assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up
5. The social context of mental health rated using the Shortened Life Events and Difficulties Schedule (SLEDS) at baseline and 3-month follow-up
Sources of fundingGuy's and St Thomas' Charitable Foundation (Grant code GO11019DF) (UK)
Sponsor nameKing's College London (UK)
Sponsor detailsResearch and Development Office, Room W1.08
Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
United Kingdom
SE5 8AF
Sponsor websitehttp://www.kcl.ac.uk/
Contact nameProf Graham Thornicroft
Contact detailsHealth Services and Population Research
Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
United Kingdom
SE5 8AF
More informationFor more up-to-date information please go to the ISRCTN link below.
Link to record in ISRCTN RegisterISRCTN06101946
Date last extracted from ISRCTN register17/04/2008
Submit your trial protocol Top studies in medical research Submit to Trials journal
terms & conditions | privacy statement | © Current Controlled Trials Ltd


BioMed Central