Welcome
Support Centre
30 August 2008 
Current Controlled Trials - Clinical Trials
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   UKCTG  |   links  |   information  |   news
Introduction
English introduction Introduction en français Deutsche einleitung
Introducción española Introduzione in italiano
 
Find trials
active registers
UKCTG
mental health register
archived registers
all registers
tips on searching
 
Registration
submit trials
 
Information
about mRCT
mRCT FAQs
data items
memorandum
contributors

DISCLAIMER
The site should not be used to diagnose or treat a health problem. Please consult your doctor.
Terms & conditions

DUPLICATION
Your search result may contain a number of different records for the same trial. This occurs when the same trial is listed in more than one register.

[ ...Back to search results ] [ Print-friendly version ]
A randomised controlled trial of nurse facilitated self-help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome. The FINE trial (Fatigue Intervention by Nurses Evaluation).
Source of recordUK Clinical Trials Gateway
ISRCTNISRCTN74156610
Date ISRCTN assigned18/05/2001
Local reference number(s)G0200212
Public titleA randomised controlled trial of nurse facilitated self-help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome. The FINE trial (Fatigue Intervention by Nurses Evaluation).
Scientific title
AcronymFINE
Disease/condition/study domainChronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)
Study hypothesis1. Is pragmatic rehabilitation, delivered at home by nurses to CFS patients recruited from primary care, a clinically effective intervention in terms of reduced disability and fatigue when compared with treatment as usual delivered through the primary care team?
2. Is pragmatic rehabilitation, delivered at home by nurses to CFS patients recruited from primary care, a cost effective intervention when compared with treatment as usual delivered through the primary care team?
3. Is supportive listening, delivered at home by nurses to CFS patients recruited from primary care, a clinically effective intervention in terms of reduced disability and fatigue when compared with treatment as usual delivered through the primary care team?
4. Is supportive listening, delivered at home by nurses to CFS patients recruited from primary care, a cost effective intervention when compared with treatment as usual delivered through the primary care team?

Can we demonstrate that the active component of pragmatic rehabilitation operates in addition to a non-specific treatment effect due to contact with a supportive therapist?
Design/methodologyRandomised controlled trial
Research ethics reviewNot provided at time of registration
Countries of trialUnited Kingdom
Participants - inclusion criteriaPatients 18 and over, who fulfil the Oxford criteria for CFS (Sharpe et al. 1991) [Prior to Feb'2005 the criteria was the Fukuda criteria], and who have a principal complaint of fatigue. Patients must score 4 or more on the 11-item Chalder fatigue scale, and 70% or less on the SF-36 physical functioning scale.
Participants - exclusion criteria1. Patients whose fatigue is explained by any active medial condition
2. Patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, dementia, eating disorder, substance abuse, morbid obesity
3. Patients with current suicidal ideation
4. Patients with anti-social, borderline or paranoid personality disorder
5. Patients who cannot read or write English sufficiently well to participate
6. Patients who are incapable of giving informed consent
Patient information material
Anticipated start date21/06/2004
Anticipated end date25/07/2008
Status of trialOngoing
Target number of participants360
Interventions1. Pragmatic rehabilitation
2. Supportive listening
3. Treatment as usual by GP
Primary outcome measure(s)The primary outcome measures will be patient-rated to avoid observer bias, and will be supplemented with an objective measure of the patient¿s exercise tolerance. These will be:
1. Score on the physical functioning scale of the SF-36
2. Cost-effectiveness using the Euroquol
3. The score on the 11-item Fatigue Scale
Secondary outcome measure(s)Secondary outcome measures will be:
1. A timed step-test to provide an objective measure of the patient¿s exercise tolerance and cardiovascular fitness
2. Scores on the HAD to provide measures of depression and anxiety
3. A brief four-item sleep scale
PublicationsStudy protocol on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16603058
Sources of fundingMedical Research Council (G0200212)
Sponsor nameUniversity of Manchester
Sponsor detailsResearch Office
Oxford Road
Manchester
United Kingdom
M13 9PL
Sponsor telephone+44 (0)161 275 2227
Sponsor emailjohn.rogers@manchester.ac.uk
Contact nameDr Alison Wearden
Contact detailsSchool of Psychological Sciences
Coupland 1 Building
Oxford Road
Manchester
United Kingdom
M13 9PL
Contact telephone+44 (0)161 275 2684
Contact fax+44 (0)161 275 2588
Contact emailalison.wearden@psy.man.ac.uk
More informationFor more up-to-date information please go to the ISRCTN link below.
Link to record in ISRCTN RegisterISRCTN74156610
Date last extracted from ISRCTN register17/04/2008
Submit your trial protocol Top studies in medical research Submit to Trials journal
terms & conditions | privacy statement | © Current Controlled Trials Ltd


BioMed Central