Welcome
Support Centre
09 September 2010 
Current Controlled Trials - Clinical Trials
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   links  |   information  |   news
Introduction
English introduction Introduction en français Deutsche einleitung
Introducción española Introduzione in italiano
 
Find trials
active registers
mental health register
archived registers
all registers
tips on searching
 
 
Information
about mRCT
mRCT FAQs

DISCLAIMER
The site should not be used to diagnose or treat a health problem. Please consult your doctor.
Terms & conditions

DUPLICATION
Your search result may contain a number of different records for the same trial. This occurs when the same trial is listed in more than one register.

[ ...Back to search results ] [ Print-friendly version ]
Comparative effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging in women with breast Cancer
Source of recordUK Trials
ISRCTNISRCTN57474502
Date ISRCTN assigned19/06/2002
Local reference number(s)HTA 99/27/05
Public titleComparative effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging in women with breast Cancer
Scientific title
AcronymCOMICE
Disease/condition/study domainBreast cancer
Study hypothesisNot provided at time of registration.
Design/methodologyRandomised controlled trial
Research ethics reviewNot provided at time of registration.
Countries of trialUnited Kingdom
Participants - inclusion criteriaPatients scheduled for wide local excision for primary breast cancer
Participants - exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration.
Patient information material
Anticipated start date01/06/2001
Anticipated end date30/09/2008
Status of trialOngoing
Target number of participants1840
InterventionsPlease note that, as of 16 January 2008, the start and anticipated end date of this trial have been updated from 1 March 2001 and 30 November 2006 to 1 June 2001 and 30 September 2008, respectively.

Interventions:
Patients are randomised to receive either the standard triple assessment (mammography, ultrasound, core biopsy/fine needle aspiration [FNA]) or standard triple assessment plus an MR scan.
Randomised controlled trial of women with primary breast cancer (PBC) scheduled for WLE following triple assessment (TA). Participants will be recruited over 36 months and a minimisation algorithm used to balance the random allocation in respect of key prognostic variables. Women will be randomised to MRI before WLE or will proceed directly to WLE. MR images will be evaluated by radiologists with prior knowledge of XRM and US results. Following review of XRM, US & MRI three outcomes are possible: MR findings equivalent to XRM/ US - proceed to WLE; multifocal lesions present or tumour size greater on MRI - surgical management reviewed; or MC disease detected. If MC lesions are <5mm patients proceed to WLE, but if >5mm MR-localised, US-guided FNAC/ core biopsy required. Biopsy -ve patients will proceed to WLE, but if +ve surgical management will be reviewed. Repeat MRI on women with < 5mm lesions or FNAC/ core biopsy -ve >5mm lesions will be performed at 1 year. Detailed serial sectioning of excised specimens will allow correlation with results of XRM, US and MRI.
Setting: Multi-centre, hospital based study involving multidisciplinary groups in Bolton, Cardiff, Hull/ Grimsby, Leeds, London (St Mary's) and Newcastle/ Gateshead. High field (1.5T) MR systems with dedicated breast coils, fast scanning capabilities and post-processing facilities are already in place.
Approximately 150-500 primary breast cancers are detected at each centre p.a., of which approximately 50% are scheduled for WLE, providing a potential trial population of 3,500. The study would be coordinated through Northern & Yorkshire Clinical Trials & Research Unit at the University of Leeds and Wales Cancer Trials Network in Cardiff. Target Population: Women with FNAC or core biopsy proven PBC scheduled for WLE after conventional triple assessment, but excluding those with contraindications to MRI or contrast medium administration. Health technologies being assessed: MRI: Multiple thin-slice (in-plane resolution 1.3 x 1.3 mm; thk 4 mm) 3D, contrast-enhanced (0.1 mmol Gd-DTPA/ kg body weight) fast spoiled gradient-echo MR sequences (temporal resolution 45 seconds), analysed using robust, easily implemented techniques (signal intensity time course evaluation) will be combined with high resolution (0.7 x 0.9 mm in plane) post-contrast fat- suppressed MR imaging for morphological information. This will be compared with XRM (medio-lateral oblique, cranio- caudal ñ paddle/ axillary views) and whole breast US (7.5 - 13 MHz linear array transducer).
Sample size: Assuming MRI will reduce overall re-operation/ mastectomy rates after WLE from 15 to 10%, 1,840 women are required to detect a benefit with 90% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. Project timetables/ recruitment rate: 0-3 months: study-specific data-base; preparation of MREC application; piloting of data collection forms; 3-39 months: patient recruitment & data collection; 49-51 months: analysis of intermediate and 66-69 months analysis of final trial data & preparation of manuscript(s). Assuming 50% of women with PBC are scheduled for WLE, a recruitment rate of 52.5% is required, and is considered achievable with study-specific Research Nurses.
Primary outcome measure(s)Cost and outcome measures:
1. Comparison of re-operation/ mastectomy/RTX rates after TA or TA and MRI.
2. IBTR rate at 5 yrs for patients imaged ñ MRI.
3. Extrapolated life expectancy and quality adjusted life expectancy.
4. Quantification of patient satisfaction with management decisions and quality of life measurements using FACT-B, HADS score, EQ-5D and ad-hoc questionnaire to examine concerns about tumour recurrence.
5. Differential resource implications in first year of TA vs TA + MRI, including measurement of indirect and personal costs incurred by patients.
6. Estimation of later costs due to differential rates of recurrence related to life expectancy and quality adjusted life expectancy.
7. Determination of sub-groups most likely to benefit from addition of DCE-MRI. 8. Effectiveness of XRM, US and DCE-MRI imaging.
Secondary outcome measure(s)Not provided at time of registration.
Sources of fundingNIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)
Sponsor nameHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Sponsor detailsHull Royal Infirmary
Anlaby Road
Hull
United Kingdom
HU3 2JZ
Sponsor websitehttp://www.hey.nhs.uk
Contact nameProf Lindsay Turnbull
Contact detailsCentre for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Hull Royal Infirmary
Anlaby Road
Hull
United Kingdom
HU3 2JZ
Contact telephone+44 (0)1482 674082
Contact fax+44 (0)1482 320137
Contact emailL.W.Turnbull@hull.ac.uk
More informationFor more up-to-date information please go to the ISRCTN link below.
Link to record in ISRCTN RegisterISRCTN57474502
Date last extracted from ISRCTN register17/04/2008
Submit your trial protocol
Submit to Trials journal
Follow us on Twitter
© 2010 Current Controlled Trials Ltd. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. | terms & conditions | privacy statement


BioMed Central