Welcome
Support Centre
21 March 2013 
ISRCTN Register - International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   links  |   information  |   news
Find trials
ISRCTN Register
tips on searching

Registration
New application
Updating record

Information
introduction
governing board
ISRCTN FAQs
data set
letter of agreement
request information
guidance notes
statistics

[ Print-friendly version ]
UK FixDT: Fixation of Distal Tibia fractures
ISRCTN ISRCTN99771224
DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN99771224
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
EudraCT number
Public title UK FixDT: Fixation of Distal Tibia fractures
Scientific title UK FixDT – A Randomised Controlled Trial for patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia, is there a clinical and cost-effectiveness difference between ‘locking’ plate fixation and intramedullary nail fixation
Acronym UK FixDT
Serial number at source HTA: 11/136/04, Version 2.0
Study hypothesis Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the Disability Rating Index (DRI) at 6 months after injury between adults with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia treated with ‘locking’-plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation.
Lay summary Lay summary under review 2
Ethics approval NRES Committee West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire, 06 November 2012, REC Reference: 12/WM/0340
Study design Multi-centre randomised clinical trial
Countries of recruitment United Kingdom
Disease/condition/study domain Distal Tibia Fractures / Injuries & Accidents
Participants - inclusion criteria 1. Aged 16 years or over, either sex
2. Any fracture which involves the distal tibial metaphysis – defined as a fracture extending within 2 Muller squares of the ankle joint17
3. In the opinion of the attending surgeon, the patient would benefit from internal fixation of the fracture
Participants - exclusion criteria 1. In the opinion of the attending surgeon, there is a contraindication to intra-medullary nailing
2. The fracture is open with a Gustillo grade of more than 1
3. There is a contra-indication to anaesthesia
4. There is evidence that the patient would be unable to adhere to trial procedures or complete postal questionnaires
Anticipated start date 01/03/2013
Anticipated end date 28/02/2017
Status of trial Ongoing
Patient information material Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Target number of participants Minimum of 320
Interventions Comparing two techniques for the operative fixation of fractures of the distal tibia.

Intramedullary Nailing
The intramedullary nail is inserted at the proximal end of the tibia and passed down the centre of the bone in order to hold the fracture in the correct (anatomical) position. The reduction technique, the surgical approach, the type and size of the nail, the configuration of the proximal and distal inter-locking screws and any supplementary device or technique will be left entirely to the discretion of the surgeon as per standard clinical practice.

'Locking’ plate fixation
The ‘locking’ plate is inserted at the distal end of the tibia and passed under the skin on the surface of the bone. Again, the details of the reduction technique, the surgical approach, the type and position of the plate, the number and configuration of fixed-angle screws and any supplementary device or technique will be left to the discretion of the surgeon. The only stipulation is that fixed-angle screws must be used in at least some of the distal screw holes – this is standard practice with all distal tibia ‘locking’ plates.
Primary outcome measure(s) To quantify and draw inferences on observed differences in the Disability Rating Index between the trial treatment groups at 6 months after injury
Secondary outcome measure(s) 1. To quantify and draw inferences on observed differences early functional status at 3 months and later functional status at 12 months
2.To quantify and draw inferences on observed differences in the radiological outcomes: non-union, mal-alignment and shortening
3. To identify any differences in health-related quality of life between the trial treatment groups in the first year after the injury. EQ-5D; The EQ-5D is a validated, generic health-related quality of life measure consisting of 5 dimensions each with a 3-level answer possibility. Each combination of answers can be converted into a health utility score. It has good test-retest reliability, is simple for patients to use, and gives a single preference-based index value for health status that can be used for broader cost-effectiveness comparative purposes.
4. To determine the complication rate of intramedullary nail fixation versus ‘locking’- plate fixation in the first year after the injury. all complications will be recorded, including malunion, delayed/non-union, infection, wound complications, vascular and neurological injury and venous thrombo-embolism. A record will also be kept of any other surgery required in relation to the index fracture, including removal of any metalwork.
5. To investigate, using appropriate statistical and economic analytical methods, the resource use, costs and comparative cost effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation versus ‘locking’-plate fixation

Olerud and Molander (OMAS) is a self-administered patient questionnaire. It is a good outcome tool for assessing symptoms after an ankle fracture. The score is based on nine different items: pain, stiffness, swelling, stair climbing, running, jumping, squatting, supports and work/activities of daily living. The scoring system correlates well with parameters considered to summarise the results after this type of injury and is therefore recommended for use in scientific investigations.
Sources of funding NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK) ref: 11/136/04
Trial website
Publications
Contact name Prof  Matthew  Costa
  Address Warwick Clinical Trials Unit
Division of Health Sciences
University of Warwick
  City/town Coventry
  Zip/Postcode CV4 7AL
  Country United Kingdom
  Tel +44 (0)24 7615 1721
  Email matthew.costa@warwick.ac.uk
Sponsor University of Warwick (UK)
  Address Research Support Services
University House
  City/town Coventry
  Zip/Postcode CV4 7AL
  Country United Kingdom
  Tel +44 (0)24 7652 3716
  Email p.a.hedges@warwick.ac.uk
  Sponsor website: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/
Date applied 07/01/2013
Last edited 10/01/2013
Date ISRCTN assigned 10/01/2013
Submit your trial protocol
Submit to Trials journal
Follow us on Twitter
© 2013 ISRCTN unless otherwise stated.