Welcome
Support Centre
11 February 2012 
ISRCTN Register - International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   links  |   information  |   press
Find trials
ISRCTN Register
tips on searching

Registration
New application
Updating record

Information
introduction
governing board
ISRCTN FAQs
data set
letter of agreement
request information
guidance notes

[ Print-friendly version ]
Improving eating behaviours in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities
ISRCTN ISRCTN48771770
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
Public title Improving eating behaviours in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities
Scientific title Improving eating behaviours in socio-economically disadvantaged communities: A randomised controlled trial
Acronym ShopSmart 4 Health
Serial number at source N/A
Study hypothesis This study aims to test the effectiveness of a skill-building nutrition promotion strategy on increasing fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption amongst women living in socio-economically disadvantaged communities. The study also aims to test the impact of the strategy on self-efficacy for, perceived barriers to, and perceived affordability of, consuming fruits and vegetables. The contribution of self- efficacy, perceived barriers and perceived affordability as mediators of changes in fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption behaviours will also be examined.

The study will test to see if there is a difference between the skill-building intervention participants and the controls, both immediately post-intervention and at a six-month follow-up, in:
1. Measures of fruit and vegetable purchasing or consumption
2. The proposed mediators, self-efficacy, perceived affordability and barriers of fruit and vegetable consumption
Lay summary Lay summary under review
Ethics approval Ethics approval received from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee - Health Medicine Nursing and Behavioural Sciences Subcommittee on the 5th February 2010 (ref: HEAG-H 188/09)
Study design A randomised controlled trial design conducted with women who shop at Coles supermarkets in two randomly-selected low-income neighbourhoods in metropolitan Melbourne

Countries of recruitment Australia
Disease/condition/study domain Supermarket-based health promotion for socio-economically disadvantaged women in the area of nutrition.
Participants - inclusion criteria Current inclusion criteria as of 09/11/2011:
1. Female
2. The main household shopper
3. Aged between 18 and 60 years
4. Shop regularly at one of the participating Coles supermarkets in low socio-economic areas
5. A FlyBuys (Coles store loyalty card) member OR willing to sign up to FlyBuys
7. Able to give written informed consent to participate in the study
8. Willing to give information about income and dietary and mediator behaviours at three time points (baseline, post-intervention and six-month follow-up)
9. Belong to one of the following low income groups: Have a weekly household income below $1000 per week after tax, have a health care card, or main income is from a pension or welfare benefit
10. Willing to have purchase data collected and analysed
11. Able to speak, read and write in English

Previous inclusion criteria:
1. Female
2. The main household shopper
3. Aged between 18 and 45 years
4. Shop regularly at one of the participating Coles supermarkets in low socio-economic areas
5. A FlyBuys (Coles store loyalty card) member OR willing to sign up to FlyBuys
6. Planning to continue to shop with Coles regularly over the next 12 months
7. Able to give written informed consent to participate in the study
8. Willing to give information about income and dietary and mediator behaviours at three time points (baseline, post-intervention and six-month follow-up)
9. Have an equivalised household income below AUS$------ (to be confirmed)
10. Willing to have purchase data collected and analysed
11. Able to speak, read and write in English
Participants - exclusion criteria Does not meet inclusion criteria
Anticipated start date 16/03/2010
Anticipated end date 16/03/2013
Status of trial Ongoing
Patient information material Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Target number of participants 274 to allow for survey non-response, drop-outs, and measuring a low-effect size as found in a similar trial in New Zealand. 137 in each study arm, with an additional 30 in the pilot study group.
Interventions A randomised controlled trial conducted with women who shop at two randomly-selected Coles supermarkets based in low-income neighbourhoods in metropolitan Melbourne.

Control:
No treatment. Participants will complete the assessments only, until the intervention and 6-month follow-up are complete, at which point they will be offered the skill building intervention materials.

Intervention:
The skill-building intervention will be delivered over a six-month period and will incorporate a range of modes of delivery and educational and behaviour change strategies.
Participants in this intervention condition will be provided with materials and resources through printed newsletters. Newsletters will be sent every two weeks for the first two months, and then once a month for the rest of the six-month intervention. Participants will also be provided with the opportunity to undertake a supermarket tour, during which the range and potential uses of fruits and vegetables (including tinned and frozen) will be identified. Elements of the intervention to be provided will include:
1. Education- will focus on raising awareness of the health- and weight-related benefits of consuming a healthy diet, particularly recommended intakes and suggestions for how to increase fruits and vegetables. The range of fruit and vegetable options available and their relative costs compared with other less healthful foods will be highlighted.
2. Skill-building – to foster behavioural skills in budgeting; meal planning; and meal preparation strategies including provision of shopping lists linked to simple recipes. This is aimed at increasing the theoretical mediators, self-efficacy and perceived affordability.
3. Goal-setting – this is a key behaviour change activity identified as a common element of successful previous dietary interventions. e.g. women will be encouraged to increase their and their families’ vegetable consumption to meet the guidelines of five serves/day.
4. Overcoming barriers – tips will be provided on overcoming commonly-reported barriers to increased fruit and vegetable consumption, e.g. suggestions will be provided on engaging familial support, given theoretical arguments and previous literature on the importance of social influences on behaviour.

A key focus of the skill-building intervention will be on affordability and addressing perceived high costs of healthy eating.
Primary outcome measure(s) Current primary outcome measures as of 27/07/11:
Data on demographic characteristics, key study outcomes and mediators will be collected pre- and immediately post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up.
1. Demographics:
1.1. Age
1.2. Family structure (marital/cohabitation status, number and ages of dependent children, other household members)
1.3. Education level
1.4. Own and household income will be assessed
2. Outcome measures:
Data on food purchasing will be gathered using a combination of electronic sales data, which Coles have confirmed they will provide to us via linkage with their store loyalty cards (FlyBuys); and self-report survey data (to assess consumption and complement the electronic sales data). We will use previously-published measures of both fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption. Measures of daily equivalent fruit and vegetable purchasing quantities (adjusted for household members/composition) and daily equivalent serves consumed will be calculated.

Previous primary outcome measures from update on 30/06/10:
Data on demographic characteristics, key study outcomes and mediators will be collected pre- and immediately post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up.
1. Demographics:
1.1. Age
1.2. Family structure (marital/cohabitation status, number and ages of dependent children, other household members)
1.3. Education level
1.4. Own and household income will be assessed
2. Outcome measures:
Data on food purchasing will be gathered using a combination of electronic sales data, which Coles have confirmed they will provide to us via store loyalty cards (Fly-Buys and/ or a study card); and self-report survey data (to assess consumption and complement the electronic food purchasing data). We will use previously-published measures of both fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption. Measures of daily equivalent fruit and vegetable purchasing quantities (adjusted for household members/composition) and daily equivalent serves consumed will be calculated.
Secondary outcome measure(s) Current secondary outcome measures as of 27/07/11:
1. Mediator measures:
We will assess self-efficacy, perceived barriers and perceived affordability via validated self-report surveys.
2. Process evaluation outcomes:
We will assess subjective perceptions of the intervention components that may be useful in predicting outcomes at the completion of the intervention.
3. Economic evaluation:
A cost consequences analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective comparing incremental costs and outcomes in the intervention arm to the control arm at 12 months. Intervention resource use and costs will be prospectively recorded via project team records and Coles data, supported by interviews with the project team. Household cost impact will be determined through external (Coles) data on food purchasing combined with participant self-report data on non-Coles and Coles-non-Flybuys food purchasing over the course of the intervention and follow-up period.

Previous secondary outcome measures from update on 30/06/10:
1. Mediator measures:
We will assess self-efficacy, perceived barriers and perceived affordability via validated self-report surveys.
2. Process evaluation outcomes:
We will assess subjective perceptions of the intervention components that may be useful in predicting outcomes at the completion of the intervention.
Sources of funding Australian Research Council (ARC) (Australia) - Industry Linkage Grant (ref: LP0990129)
Trial website
Publications
Contact name Prof  Kylie  Ball
  Address 221 Burwood Highway
  City/town Burwood, Victoria
  Zip/Postcode 3125
  Country Australia
Sponsor Australian Research Council (ARC) (Australia)
  Address GPO Box 2702
  City/town Canberra ACT
  Zip/Postcode 2601
  Country Australia
Date applied 04/06/2010
Last edited 09/11/2011
Date ISRCTN assigned 30/06/2010
Submit your trial protocol
Submit to Trials journal
Follow us on Twitter
© 2012 ISRCTN unless otherwise stated.


BioMed Central