Welcome
Support Centre
21 May 2012 
ISRCTN Register - International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   links  |   information  |   press
Find trials
ISRCTN Register
tips on searching

Registration
New application
Updating record

Information
introduction
governing board
ISRCTN FAQs
data set
letter of agreement
request information
guidance notes

[ Print-friendly version ]
Assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins
ISRCTN ISRCTN32956054
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
Public title Assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins
Scientific title
Acronym REACTIV
Serial number at source HTA 95/05/06
Study hypothesis The project will assess the cost effectiveness of the commonly used treatments for Varicose Veins by way of Markov process decision model. The data for the modelling will be obtained through a combination if systematic literature review and the collection of retrospective and prospective data on patients undergoing treatment for varicose veins. This will include randomised controlled studies in three sub-groups of patients in whom conservative treatment, sclerotherapy and surgery will be compared.
The model will allow an assessment of the incremental cost effectiveness of each treatment modality in sub groups of patients based upon their symptomatic, investigative and demographic features. Patient and societal priorities for treatment will be assessed using a "willingness to pay" (WTP) technique.
Lay summary
Ethics approval Added as of 25/07/2007: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from both Sheffield and Exeter Local Research Ethics Committees.
Study design Randomised controlled trial
Countries of recruitment United Kingdom
Disease/condition/study domain Varicose veins/ulcers
Participants - inclusion criteria Patients undergoing treatment for varicose veins
Participants - exclusion criteria Added as of 25/07/2007:

General exclusion criteria:
1. Unwillingness to give informed consent
2. Unwilling or unable to complete assessment protocol
3. Current evidence of thrombophlebitis, ulceration or DVT

Specific exclusion criteria:

Group 1 Sclerotherapy vs conservative treatment:
1. Patients with deep venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex
2. Allergy to sclerosant
3. Diameter of varicose veins >2 cm

Group 2 Sclerotherapy vs surgery:
1. Patients with deep venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex
2. Allergy to sclerosant
3. Diameter of varicose veins >2 cm
4. Pre-existing co-morbidities that would make them unsuitable for surgery
5. BMI >32

Group 3 Surgery vs conservative treatment:
1. Patients with deep venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex
2. Allergy to sclerosant
3. Diameter of varicose veins >2 cm
4. Pre-existing co-morbidities that would make them unsuitable for surgery.
5. BMI >32
Anticipated start date 01/10/1998
Anticipated end date 30/09/2003
Status of trial Completed
Patient information material
Target number of participants 1,009
Interventions Interventions updated as of 25/07/2007:
Group 1 (34 patients): minor varicose veins with no reflux, randomised between conservative treatment and sclerotherapy
Group 2 (77 patients): moderate varicose veins with reflux, randomised between surgery and sclerotherapy
Group 3 (246 patients): severe varicose veins with reflux, randomised between conservative treatment and surgery

The remaining 652 patients formed the observational part of the study.

Interventions provided at time of registration:
1. Conservative treatment
2. Sclerotherapy
3. Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s) Primary outcome measures updated as of 25/07/2007:
1. Clinical effectiveness, as measured using the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) utility valuation
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis

Primary outcome measures provided at time of registration:
Cost-effectiveness of each treatment
Secondary outcome measure(s) Added as of 25/07/2007:
1. Complications of treatment
2. Symptomatic relief
3. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and patient satisfaction. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form with 36 Items (SF-36), EuroQol quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D) and standard gamble questionnaires.
Sources of funding NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)
Trial website
Publications 2006 HTA monograph in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707070
Contact name Mr  Jonathan  Michaels
  Address Department of Vascular Surgery
Sheffield Vascular Institute
Northern General Hospital
Herries Road
  City/town Sheffield
  Zip/Postcode S5 7AU
  Country United Kingdom
  Tel +44 (0)114 2269124
  Fax +44 (0)114 2610112
  Email jonathan.michaels@sth.nhs.uk
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
  Address Quarry House
Quarry Hill
  City/town Leeds
  Zip/Postcode LS2 7UE
  Country United Kingdom
  Tel +44 (0)1132 545 843
  Email Sheila.Greener@doh.gsi.gov.uk
  Sponsor website: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/index.htm
Date applied 25/04/2003
Last edited 01/09/2009
Date ISRCTN assigned 25/04/2003
Submit your trial protocol
Submit to Trials journal
Follow us on Twitter
© 2012 ISRCTN unless otherwise stated.


BioMed Central