Welcome
Support Centre
29 August 2008 
ISRCTN Register - International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number
Trial registration
Unique identification scheme
International databases
home  |   my details  |   ISRCTN Register  |   mRCT  |   UKCTG  |   links  |   information  |   press
Find trials
ISRCTN Register
tips on searching

Registration
New application
Updating record

Information
introduction
governing board
ISRCTN FAQs
data set
letter of agreement
request information
guidance notes

[ Print-friendly version ]
Randomised controlled trial comparing two treatment methods for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease
ISRCTN ISRCTN23585705
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier
Public title Randomised controlled trial comparing two treatment methods for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease
Scientific title A randomised trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus rubber band ligation in the treatment of circumferential symptomatic grade II haemorrhoids
Acronym N/A
Serial number at source N/A
Study hypothesis Treatment with stapled haemorrhoidopexy produces better symptom control and less recurrent disease compared to rubber band ligation; both are considered to treat the disease in a similar mechanism of fixing the haemorrhoidal cushion without excising them.
Ethics approval Ethics approval received from the Grampian Research Ethics Committee on the 11th August 2002 (ref: 01/0297).
Study design Single centre, randomised controlled trial
Countries of recruitment United Kingdom
Disease/condition/study domain Circumferential grade II symptomatic haemorrhoids
Participants - inclusion criteria Circumferential grade II symptomatic haemorrhoids irrespective of age and gender.
Participants - exclusion criteria 1. Associated anaorctal sepsis
2. Associated colonic malignancy or inflammatory bowel disease
3. Associated anal sphincter pathology
Anticipated start date 20/10/2002
Anticipated end date 02/04/2005
Status of trial Completed
Patient information material
Target number of participants 60
Interventions 1. Rubber band ligation
2. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy

Both arms are treated as a one-off to begin with and then reviewed at six weeks. As per the protocol, If there is a recurrence of disease, a repeat treatment can be given. The rubber band ligation can be repeated up to four times at six-week intervals, before being declared failure of treatment. Similarly, the stapled haemorrhoidopexy will be repeated up to two more times before declared as failure of treatment.

Total follow-up is up to one year including 6-week and 26-week follow-ups in between.
Primary outcome measure(s) Disease recurrence at six weeks and one year.
Secondary outcome measure(s) 1. Symptom score (validated and published already)
2. Cleveland continence score
3. Quality of life score (36-item Short Form health survey [SF-36], EuroQoL instrument [EQ-5D] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HAD] scores)
4. Cost effectiveness
5. Sphincter damage

All secondary outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks, 26 weeks and one year.
Sources of funding Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH (Germany)
Trial website
Publications
Contact name Mr  Malcolm  Loudon
  Address Ward 50
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Foresterhill
  City/town Aberdeen
  Zip/Postcode AB25 2ZN
  Country United Kingdom
Sponsor Medicines Assessment Research Unit (MARU) (UK)
  Address c/o Mr MA Loudon and Mr AJM Watson
Grampian Hospitals NHS Trust
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Ward 50
Foresterhill
  City/town Aberdeen
  Zip/Postcode AB25 2ZN
  Country United Kingdom
  Sponsor website: http://www.nhsgrampian.org
Date applied 05/05/2008
Last edited 23/06/2008
Date ISRCTN assigned 23/06/2008
Submit your trial protocol Top studies in medical research Submit to Trials journal
© ISRCTN


BioMed Central